as a whole being a single expression. I expect your talk will help clarify this stuff or me as it's still (obviously) a little unclear for me.

* "Every 0s Timers" - if you already have 0s timers in your code, then using ternary operations inside "Change attribute" behaviors instead of rules has two big ben

The issue is there are two types of rules there: nested, and multi-conditional. You keep trying to call A multi-conditional and B nested, but A just a written representation of B. C is multi-condition

I've only differentiated them in that one is expression based and the other is rule based, in that respect they do have different names.

Somebody said that when a table changes a value, they make a copy of the table and delete the old? Thus that imply only a single cell value can be changed at a time? And if you try to change two value

@tinoboss123 are you singed in with your apple account on Xcode? When you look at accounts there it should list all of your profiles that are available.

a defense game as a lesson, they will both leave you with a solid understanding of Gamesalad though. Some of the game types I cover is lessons in the book and class are runner games, physics puzzle g

Could always do a free version with ads at first as a way to check for any bugs you may of missed and then once your sure there's nothing there release a paid one. Since nothing's worse then buying a

All you need to know is that someone, somewhere, is growing pseudo nested quasi ternary operational decision trees.

A and B are both nested rules. C and D are both multi-conditional rules. So you're trying to compare two of the same things while giving them different names. In the case of comparing two things, then

This would make sense as that tree is one logic structure and need to be viewed as a whole. Do other languages handle that differently?

multi-conditional expression equivilent would do the same given that as Hopscotch says: "a decision tree needs to be defined for the whole operation before the real evaluation happens&qu

as you like (Image)

One tap on three or more adjacent same fruits or candies will burst them with a nice effect, more fruits or candies burst at same time more high scores you achieve

The usual trick would be to use game.time or self.time for the angle, but any changing value would do, for example you could interpolate an attribute, you could use change attribute within a timer or

you can also attempt to create your own server today, check out the tutorial in my sig on a basic tutorial, but it is very complex.

You're welcome.

Multiplayer can only be tested via creator. You have to build out a sign in system in creator and a game lobby et... Multiplayer is pretty complex.

This is most likely the case. I'm a little uncertain about how "progressing" works in the formula, like how it appears. Since if I constrain rotation to numbers being added, subtract

I guess you just make an exact copy of the ad monetized version and get ride of all the ads to make the priced version?