@dgackey nope... absolutely not. The core of the business is a game development tool/engine. Improving and supporting that, and fixing it when it doesn't work as its meant to should be your prime goal

Also, perhaps to still have a Free option for these folks need a lot of time to learn the tool, you could release a limited Creator that would like something like this:

@Socks @pHghost ..ok..time out... can you both just agree to disagree and leave it at that. I think both your points were made early in the thread, and now your just winding each other up for the sake

This isn't anything new. GS has always been about appealing to people who wanted to make games but weren't professional programmers.

So whatever you say is just your opinion, but whatever I say I am putting it into your mouth, just because I start with a conversational so and use rhetorical questions?

In the short term this means: Graphene is on hold and GS is the core focus of the company. Anything that doesn't serve that master gets put on the back burner. Most of the things we're focusing on

...but I have to say your starting to lose me with all this talk and focus on monetising teaching people how to build games. Is this going to deflect resources away from improving the engine?

You got my attention. I didn't wan't to be rude in any way in the other thread, the rapid change just made me a little upset, thats all.

This has been mentioned. What does that mean though? Tutorials are nice, but learning to think in game logic is a process you have to go through yourself. Is that what you mean? Access to learning mat

its an endless jump type game, you had to balance the position of the octopus while jumping.

It's not clear what point you are making here, just quoting a bunch of stuff without explaining why doesn't really argue for anything.

You like Bomb Down，I am very happy. ^_^

Not good enough, you must also provide basic accounts for at least 100 people and get 10 others to do the same, we then can start a chain reaction.

@jonmulcahy I'm not saying I don't find it worth the money, because it absolutely is! When I can pay the yearly subscription very very soon, I might do it again. I'm just saying that beginners might n

But being a ladies’ man and a gentleman, you can't poop on the ladies! That would not be dignified or chivalrous and if he were to accidentally poop on a woman he would choose death over dishonor and

Tiger27, Thanks so much! I've spent the better part of the morning creating the actor, table and entering in the code. The only thing I have left to do is wrap my brain around what each rule does spec

But as far as competition, I think the situation is not quite so bad as you think. Many engines are more powerful or have more features than GameSalad, but I've never seen an engine that's easier to l

I have been learning swift on the side, and am starting to look into unity as I want to try developing for the Occulus Rift. In ** less time** than it took me to learn how to create an 'cat years' app

Yes, they will, but wouldn't it be better to make it worth first? Stunning continues updates will make it worth for a lot of people, but I haven't seen that yet...

@RossmanBrothersGames - Hope you find a good solution so you can keep on using GameSalad!