Heads up for Tshirtbooth
beefy_clyro
Member Posts: 5,394
Hey dude. You were asking questions about application content and what is allowed etc. I would suggest you scrap whatever you had in mind. I had an app out that had no nudity, it was just girls in bikinis and apple have now removed it and made a massive change in guidelines. Basically they have said they have removed my app and the below quote;
" However, we have recently received numerous complaints from our customers about this type of content, and have changed our guidelines appropriately. We have decided to remove any overtly sexual content from the App Store, which includes your application."
Hope that saves you some time and effort!
" However, we have recently received numerous complaints from our customers about this type of content, and have changed our guidelines appropriately. We have decided to remove any overtly sexual content from the App Store, which includes your application."
Hope that saves you some time and effort!
Comments
I am already sick of all the china made "hot girls in tide T-shirts" apps on the app store.
And this although I am not gay, I am from europe and I am not prude in any means :-P
Thanks for the heads up beefy_clyro
So I just thought I'd check
I popped open the ole app store. Went lifestyle. Surprise. Amateur thongs and college boob party right there in the top raking in the tens of thousands of dollars per day.
With deleting best selling erotic apps they would cut their revenue as well, so I assume, above a certain ammount of daily revenue they will stay.
The quality of the apps is also important. I have no problem with high quality erotic apps. I have problem with the apps showing 10 pictures taken from the web.
I've got a cartoon chef throwing pots at cartoon vegetables, and I had to think... was this violence? I finally decided it was defense after looking up the definition, but people interpret things differently.
It is always a russian roulette. I wouldn't think much about it.
We got apps rejected due to internet usage, while other apps which had the same function got through. There is no pattern.
Apple rejected it for being... too violent.
Some people might think, "OMG!? Violence to children? You monster!" However, the "violence" in the game is pretty abstracted, and is not the goal of the game. Compared to what's in the App Store, it's awfully tame. I even asked our beta testers; none of them had a problem with the content, and that group included many parents, and a couple grandparents. (All of whom must be, by Apple's reckoning, abjectly depraved individuals.)
Gah. It wouldn't be so bad if there had been more definitive guidelines, rather than, "uhhh, it shouldn't be, like, objectionable, indecent, but you know, lots more indecent that just farting b00bz or exploding heads, and stuff."
Can you tell it still irks me (although I like the game more with penguins)?
(There's more background on the morass here, if anyone's interested. With literature citations and everything, yo: http://www.goatcartgames.com/2010/02/what-happened-to-angel-thy-guardian/)