App rejection, please help.
BlueFanStudios
Member Posts: 77
Reasons for Rejection:
2.31 Apps that are not sandboxed appropriately may be rejected
3.4 App names in iTunes Connect and as displayed on Mac OS X should be the same, so as not to cause confusion
2.31 - This app uses one or more entitlements which do not appear to have matching functionality within the app. Please describe how and where the app uses the following entitlements by adding your comments to the Resolution Center. You will not need to upload a new binary to provide this information."
There is no explanation on what this means or how to solve this problem
2.31 Apps that are not sandboxed appropriately may be rejected
3.4 App names in iTunes Connect and as displayed on Mac OS X should be the same, so as not to cause confusion
2.31 - This app uses one or more entitlements which do not appear to have matching functionality within the app. Please describe how and where the app uses the following entitlements by adding your comments to the Resolution Center. You will not need to upload a new binary to provide this information."
There is no explanation on what this means or how to solve this problem
Comments
you can only wait for the new release of the creator.
✮My Web Site✮ ✮My Full Games On Sale✮ ✮Follow Me✮ ✮My Video Channel✮ ✮Contact Me To Buy My GS Games✮
Guru Video Channel | Lost Oasis Games | FRYING BACON STUDIOS
Thanks,
Wayne
The app is claiming for .network.server entitlement but we are unsure the functionality the entitlement is used for. Therefore asking you to explain.
One commonly added entitlement many apps don't need is "com.apple.security.network.server".
Apps that initiate outgoing connections (for example, to download new content from your server) only need to include "com.apple.security.network.client". The server entitlement is only necessary for apps that listen for and respond to incoming network connections (such as web or FTP servers).
...I'm assuming that this is out of our control and we need GS to handle this?
Putting a bug report in now.
Cheers
Wayne
After appealing, they said that training a child to use their memory was copyrighted and that using the word memory is not allowed in the title.
After 2nd appeal, and citing numerous ridiculousness of their process, (especially because there is a memory matching game on the App Store, called... duh duh duh "Memory"), they went silent for 3 days, and then approved my app. https://itunes.apple.com/us/app/happy-zoo-match-and-learn-hd/id576272956?ls=1&mt=8
Best of luck, and keep on the appeals. Appeal, appeal, appeal, and then appeal some more. I know that you are probably losing sleep and it feels like your heart has been ripped out.
It will turn around.
com.apple.security.network.client: true
com.apple.security.app-sandbox: true
com.apple.security.network.server: true
...my app has been rejected because of the bottom one. I suppose the app is claiming it needs to act as a server in some way, which it obviously doesn't, unless GS have added a new feature?!
Anyway, I've resubmitted, but the new version also shows this request, so I'm expecting to be rejected again. I've already submitted a bug report, but haven't heard anything since.
Anybody else got any ideas?
Cheers
Wayne
Actually that one is not apple's call. They really shouldn't have approved your app. They probably did get tired of the appeals.
That german company is taking down apps left and right that have memory in their title and are any type of memory game. I got a cease and desist from them for two of my titles. Apple ended up removing my two titles from the appstore.
Its not up to apple to be the judge. Apple simply got a notification from this company about their trademark and took my apps down because that company and I couldn't work things out.
Apple just did what they are supposed to, its up to me to get an attorney and fight the company to try to get my apps back up. However I was only making a few dollars a month on those titles so its certainly not worth a fight.