Can Pro users modify games for Express users?

PhoticsPhotics Member Posts: 4,172
edited November -1 in Working with GS (Mac)
Has Gendai Games stated an official policy on this?

If I buy a "Pro" license, what services could I offer?

-- Could I make games for clients?
-- Could I add iAds, links and custom loading screens for Express users?

I think of the ethical debate. If I buy a copy of Adobe Flash, I can make Flash files for clients, so shouldn't I be able to do the same with the "Pro" version of GameSalad? Yet, Gendai Games is trying to run a business too. So, that's why I post this thread. What's their official stance?

One could argue that it's unethical. Yet, maybe it's not. If people set up businesses, offering professional services, it creates a new market... which makes GameSalad more important. Also, is it ethical to place such a restriction on "Pro" users? Why shouldn't they be able to offer services with software that they paid for.

So... it comes down to this... respect. If Gendai Games says they don't want users to do that, OK, I can respect it. Yet, shouldn't the same respect be shown to the community? This is an unanswered question?

Comments

  • Rob2Rob2 Member Posts: 2,402
    Unethical + wouldn't work...(app signing)
  • reddotincreddotinc Member Posts: 653
    It WOULD work.. You would just need their certificates etc, and would be a lot of hassle to keep updating..

    But yeh it's unethical.. Support Gendai and in the end it will bring us all a better tool.

    // Red Dot Inc
  • BarkBarkCoBarkBarkCo Member Posts: 1,400
    Rob2 said:
    Unethical + wouldn't work...(app signing)

    I'm sorry, but I disagree on both points.

    #1 By your estimation the entire freelance industry is unethical. By definition, a "Pro" tool should be able to be used for doing work for your "company" as well as your "clients"...

    #2 Have you personally tested this? Otherwise, how can you definitively say that this "wouldn't work"? Back to my first point, if a freelance dev works on apps that are released by others, there has to be a way for that dev to sign the apps. Seems like the "Express" user would just need to provide the "Pro" with his/her own provisioning profile(s).
  • Rob2Rob2 Member Posts: 2,402
    I wasn't referring to the for clients bit ...obviously you can make games for clients
  • PhoticsPhotics Member Posts: 4,172
    Rob2 said:
    Unethical + wouldn't work...(app signing)

    I half agree...

    A technical issue... app signing would be a problem. People would have to share sensitive information.

    As for the ethical issue, I'm not sure I agree. If I make an app for a client, I can create custom loading screens for them, add iAds and stuff like that. How's that really different? Although, it's not even clear to me that you can use GameSalad for creating client apps.

    Have you noticed how quiet it has been since Gendai Games got the million? They're working on something...
    Yodapollo said:
    And, believe me, there's some exciting stuff on the way!

    I'm not sure why they're so cryptic. Why aren't they more upfront? Why don't they simply say what they're working on? Also, they probably know that "Pro" is too expensive. It's like a cancer on this community. The general consensus appear to be that $1999 is too expensive, but $250-$500 for one version of GameSalad seems acceptable. Yet, they're stuck. How do you keep all those customers that paid $1999 for "Pro" happy?

    I'm seriously considering upgrading to Pro. Yet, I worry about a return on my investment. Also, I worry about getting burned. What if I spend $2000 today and then they reduce the price to $500 tomorrow?
  • BarkBarkCoBarkBarkCo Member Posts: 1,400
    Rob2 said:
    I wasn't referring to the for clients bit ...obviously you can make games for clients

    How is another user of GS different from a client? Except that they've done most of the game design work for you(the pro).
  • reddotincreddotinc Member Posts: 653
    Me too, the unethical part was using your pro license to sell services to express members.
  • BarkBarkCoBarkBarkCo Member Posts: 1,400
    reddotinc said:
    Me too, the unethical part was using your pro license to sell services to express members.

    I would gladly give up my "Express" membership and go back to the free version of GS, is that better? lol

    Honestly, this is only an issue if Gendai says it's an issue.
  • Rob2Rob2 Member Posts: 2,402
    and certificates in keychain...etc etc
  • PhoticsPhotics Member Posts: 4,172
    BarkBarkCo said:
    Honestly, this is only an issue if Gendai says it's an issue.

    That's the conclusion I reached... heh... but they're not saying anything.
  • ChunkypixelsChunkypixels Member Posts: 1,114
    A pro user should definately be able to make apps for their clients....

    as having clients and doing work for them is pretty much part and parcel of being a "Professional" developer.

    I think the possibly unethical bit comes when you start offering services to other GameSalad members... specifically to Express members, and offering them services that they would otherwise have to pay for the Pro account to use. This is where it gets a bit dubious, as it could be argued that your using Gendais own software to harm their business by bypassing the need for customers to purchase the pro account.

    I dont think there would be any problem with pro users doing work for other pro users though.
  • dknelldknell Member Posts: 48
    BarkBark makes some very good points. Perhaps this could be part of the reason that the Pro membership is so expensive. Maybe in their eyes the term "Pro" defined someone (or a company) that makes games for other entities in exchange for a fee.

    As Photics mentions, $2000 is a huge risk for an individual who is gambling on a game to become popular enough to make a $2000+ ROI.

    I say if you buy the Pro membership - do whatever the hell you want with it! :)

    Sorry to sound like a broken record, but if "they" have a problem with it, they should change their business model and not sell a tool.
  • iDeveloperziDeveloperz Member Posts: 1,169
    No, game salad do say on the first email...

    "This account is for your use only. Please do not share this login with anyone."

    So I don't think they would like it.
  • beefy_clyrobeefy_clyro Member Posts: 5,394
    Would be nice if Gendai officially responded to this
  • chosenonestudioschosenonestudios Member Posts: 1,714
    tshirtbooth said:
    I do not think they will say anything. If it was not ok they would say NO but they always say noththing. That makes me think you can but they dont want to come out and say it.

    cheers

    Sounds good
  • JamesBoucherJamesBoucher Member Posts: 433
    Freelance is freelance. If you have the Pro then you should be able to use it for any client, GS indie user, GS Pro user and none GS user all together. I don't think GS should determine who's you client. Other professionals outsource to others in there same profession, like advertising, software development, construction, web designers, etc...

    Can it be done? I think so, and I don't think you even need the certificates. I think you just need the Provisioning Profile. The Provisioning Profile is what holds the certificates. Maybe there's more to it !!!
Sign In or Register to comment.