If you have dozens or even hundreds of levels - and don't want to enter a new value for each scene you could do this . . . .

thanks

Very nice! Thank you for sharing!

Frank you wery mutch.

Make a game attribute.

(Quote)

@Socks You can always fall back on your writing skills. I would buy your books (Image)

I am working on a game right now and every level will have a certain number of enemies you need to kill inorder to move to the next level. What would be the most efficient way to do this...every leve

the goal is to create a science fictional top down multiplayer team based shooter (hopefully a 64+ player experience). Once development plans have been established we will proceed to begin work on pr

I'm gonna direct you to a thread you created in December:

You lost me at Pinot Noir, buddy. I thought you would reach for a scotch or something. (Image)

Only five? Man, I envy you...

Lovely! Looking forward to playing your game! And great to see you back and active!

So if you enjoy creating art, maybe you should try reskining that app you know its good but wasn't successful. You wont have to deal with new mechanics or new play concept, maybe meanwhile you have in

Since they were the once making money or/and represented my state of art.

Good and Bad... Good that I am motivated bad that I can not finish a game

I discovered that as long as the actor in question is marked as MOVEABLE in the Physics properties, it does indeed return "true" as overlapping, even if it's spawned on top of the ot

Are you able to frame this as a good thing ?

BUG: "Overlap or Collide" is not detected if you spawn an actor within the same space as another?

"Currently, my skid marks spawn on top of the car, and I'll need to make another actor that follows along with the car everywhere if I want it to leave skidmarks in the right order"