So if you make a game and put it on re AppStore for $1000, then you buy It yourself, wouldn't you be up really high in the top grossing apps overall? Then you can quickly put it to 0.99 and since more

How were sales yesterday? I'll stop bugging you after this, I'm just really interested since you were in the top 100

@polygame: C is actually a fairly small language. Everything is built on top of it.

And it's a fairly complex Rule set. You can click on the Roll Dice button as well as all the dice themselves, as well as the buttons at top with the scores.

@polygame: C is actually a fairly small language. Everything is built on top of it.

Objective-C is built on top of C. It is what is known as a "superset".

As for the asteroids... that's up to the player. blast too many and it gets VERY difficult (and you get more points). I did originally have it so that the grey asteroids were invincible but thanks to

timer- after 1 second, destroy actor

The object of this game is to pop as many of the blue bubbles and not the red bubbles. You get points and additional time for ever blue bubble you pop. You lose time for every red bubble you pop. Addi

Try changing an attribute where you are expecting the destroy to happen. Have this displayed in an actor on the scene and see what happens.

3) Gameloft's main bread and butter is to do similar things with major console games. Off the top of my head, they did similar things with Halo(N.O.V.A.), Resident Evil 5(Zombie Infection), and the Mo

They do automatically destroy when they reach a certain point. Bit of a pain, really as destroying doesn't free up memory anyway.

I don't know if there is a default setting on actors that go out of screen whether they are automatically destroy or not; so in my game I set an event whether the actor goes after X to be destroy, but

how many layer you use?

how many layer you use?

Deep dark secret:Destroy the world (Image)

I ALWAYS see what's in style before submitting! Finger balance had an overnight success. The release date was yesterday, and it went to new and noteworthy with no reviews to the #6 top overall app. It

they are to "spawn in" and not destroy. The "Spawn" and "Destroy" method adds a lot more CPU strain than the aforementioned one. Does that help?

Yes, it is similar to Basic ShootEm Up template. I'm concerned about how Spawning Actors uses memory. If they never get destroyed do they eventually fill up memory? Is it better to have the actors des

Is this the best way to implement this? Should I use Spawn Actor/Destroy Actor instead?